Hamidreza Peighambari
Abstract
Which parts of Arabian Peninsula were under the Achaemenids’ control? and how did they administer those regions? Researchers have widely different viewpoints on the answers to ...
Read More
Which parts of Arabian Peninsula were under the Achaemenids’ control? and how did they administer those regions? Researchers have widely different viewpoints on the answers to these questions. The present paper is an attempt to clarify the political and administrative policy of the Achaemenids regarding this land, through reviewing previous research, and according to new historical and archaeological evidence. This study indicates that a large part of the peninsula was unknown and out of reach at that time. So, it cannot be considered as an integrated geographical and political unit. It seems that, Arabia, administratively and politically, was divided into separate parts: the satrapy of Arabāya from southern Syria and the Negev desert to the northern Hijaz; and some areas along the southern coasts of the Persian Gulf, such as Bahrain (Tiliman/Dilmun) and Oman (Maka), were also considered as separate political units. The Achaemenids’ administrative system managed the southern coasts of the Persian Gulf through the satrapies of Babylon and Makran (14th Satrapy), and they had under control the transit areas of northern and western Arabia through an alliance with the Qedarite Confederation. The expansion of qanats and the revenues from the incense trade show that there has been a mutually beneficial relationship between the two sides.
