Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 thran

2 Iran, Tehran, University of Tehran, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Department of History

10.22059/jhss.2025.399744.473831

Abstract

This study employs a historical-analytical approach, drawing on Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of symbolic capital and Max Weber’s concept of legitimate power, to explore the role of scientific medals and honors during Iran’s Qajar and Pahlavi periods. It posits that these honors were not merely tokens of recognition but strategic tools for reinforcing political power by identifying and elevating regime-aligned elites while marginalizing independent intellectuals. Findings show that, starting in the Qajar era with institutions like Dar al-Funun, medals became mechanisms for stabilizing the political order. In the Pahlavi period, this process was systematized through stricter regulations and the University of Tehran’s prominence, fostering a loyal elite structure. Bourdieu’s framework highlights how these honors deepened social and class distinctions, tying elites to power, while Weber’s perspective underscores their role in establishing rational-legal legitimacy and distinguishing social status. This dynamic strengthened the regime but also widened cultural and social divides, contributing to political upheavals like the Islamic Revolution. The study reveals how scientific medals, as symbolic capital, served to legitimize ruling systems and reproduce elite structures, offering new insights into the interplay of culture, science, and politics in modern Iranian history and emphasizing the need to reassess symbolic capital’s role in Iran’s historical-political studies.

Keywords

Main Subjects