Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Ph.D in Ancient History of Iran, University of Isfahan, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Department of History and Iranology, Isfahan, Iran.

Abstract

Marriage and family formation held paramount importance in Zoroastrianism, providing a framework wherein each family member could benefit from social rights and advantages. Women, as fundamental members of the family, could also avail themselves of these benefits. However, not all women could equally enjoy these advantages, as certain conditions within Zoroastrianism could influence a woman’s financial status. This descriptive-analytical research aims to examine the status of women’s ownership by conducting a case study of two documents, 22 and 22bis, from Tabarestān. These two documents concern a complaint regarding properties held by a pādixšāy-zan and the judicial process of their investigation is meticulously explored. The investigations indicate that by studying these two documents and other legal texts, such as the Mādiyān ī Hazār Dādestān, it can be concluded that a woman’s ownership of these assets was not absolute but rather conditional upon her position and obligations within the family institution

Keywords

Main Subjects

Carlsen, B. H., (1984). “The Cakar marriage contract and the Cakar children’s status in the Mȃtiyȃn ȋ Hazȃr Dȃtistȃn and Rivȃyat i Ȇmȇt i Aŝavahiŝtȃn.” In: Middle Iranian Studies. ed. W. Skalmowshi & A. van Tongerloo. Leuven. Pp. 103-114.
Dārāb Hormazyār's Rivāyat. (1922). ed. Maneckji Rustamji Unvala. Bombay[in Persian].
Gignoux, Ph., (2012). “Une archive post-Sasanian du Tabaristān (I. Object et documents inscrits en Pārsīg).” édité par R. Gyselen. Bures-sur-Yvette. Group pour l’Étude de la civilization du Moyen-Orient (Res Orientales XXI). Pp. 29-96.
Ghazanfari, Kolsom. Badamchi, Hossein, Davari, Parvin. Marriage and its requirements in Islam and Zoroastrianism: a comparative study.(2016). Woman in Culture and Arts.Vol.8. Issue 3. Pp. 395-410[in Persian].
Macuch, M., (2004). “Inheritance i. Sasanian Period.” In: Encyclopædia Iranica. Vol. XIII. Pp.125-131.
Macuch, M., (2005). “On Middle Persian Legal Terminology.” In: Middle Iranian Lexicography: Proceedings of the Conference held in Rome. eds. C. Cereti and M. Maggi. Roma. (Orientalia Romana 8). Pp. 375-386.
Macuch, M., (2007). “The Pahlavi Model Marriage Contract in the light of Sasanian Family Law.” In: Iranian Languages and Texts from Iran and Turfan. ed. M. Macuch, M. Maggi and W. Sundermann. Pp.183-205.
Macuch, M., (2009). “Judicial and Legal systems III. Sasanian legal System.” In: Encyclopaedia Iranica. ed. Ehsan Yarshater. Vol. XV. New York. Pp. 181-196.
Macuch, M., (2016). “The Legal context of Tabarestȃn Court Records (Tab.1-8, 10).” In: Words and Symbols: Sasanian Objects and the Tabarȃstan Archive. Bures-Sur-Yvette: Group Pour l’Ḗtude de la Civilisation du Moyen-Orient (Res Orientales XXIV). ed. R. Gyselen. Pp.145-170.
Macuch, M., (2017). “Pahlavi Legal Documents from Tabarestȃn on Lease, Loan and Compensation: The Juristic Context (Tab. 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 23).” In: Sasanian Coins, Middle-Persian Etymology and the Tabarestȃn Archive. Bures-Sur-Yvette: Group l’Ḗtude de la Civilisation du Moyen-Orient (Res Orientales XXVI). ed. R. Gyselen. Pp.165-195.
Macuch, M., (2019). “Pahlavi Legal Documents from Tabarestȃn. Two Claim and a Re-evaluation of Crop Yields: The Juristiv of Tab. 21, 22 & 24.” In: Sasanian Persia and the Tabarestȃn Archive. Bures-Sur-Yvette: Groupe Pour l’Ḗtude de la Civilisation du Moyen –Orient (Res Orientales XXVII). ed. R. Gyselen. Pp.117-150.
Macuch, M., (2022). “Pahlavi Legal Documents from Tabarestān: The Juristic context of Tab. 16, 19, 20, 22bis and 25.” In: Sometimes Sasanian Always ĒR. édité par R. Gyselen. Bures-sur-Yvette. Group pour l’Étude de la civilization du Moyen-Orient (Res Orientales XXIX). Pp. 131-160.
Mazaheri, Ali Akbar, (1998). Iranian Family in pre-Islamic Iran. A. Tavakol (tr.), Tehran: Qatreh: [in Persian].
Perikhanian, A., (1997). The Book of a Thousand Judgments (A Sasanian Law Book). Costa Mesa.
Perikhanian, A., (2010). ''Iranian Society and Law". The Cambridge History of Iran, III/2, ed. E. Yarshater.tr.H. Anoushe. Tehran. Amir -Kabir[in Persian].
Revāyat-e Āḏar Farnbaḡ-e Farroḵzādān. (2007). H. Rezaʾei Baghbidi (ed.).Tehran. the Great Islamic Encyclopedia[in Persian].
Revāyat-e Emid-e Ašavaheštān (motaʿalleq be sada-ye čahārom-e hejri), (1998), ed. N. Safa-Isfehani, Tehran: Markaz[in Persian].
Saddar Nasr and Saddar Bundahesh. (1909).ed. B. N. Dhabhar. Bombay[in Persian].
Shaki, M., 1971. “The Sasanian Matrimonial relation.” In: Archiv Orientalni 39. Pp. 322-345.
Shaki, M., (1990). “Čakar.” In: Encyclopædia Iranica. Vol. IV. Pp. 647-649.
Shaki, M., (1999). “Family Law in Zoroastrianism.” In: Encyclopædia Iranica. Vol. IX. Pp.184-196.
Weber, D., (2019). “Pahlavi Legal Documents from Tabarestȃn. Two Claim and a Re-evaluation of   Crop Yields: The Juristic of Tab. 21, 22 & 24.” In: Sasanian Persia and the Tabarestȃn Archive. Bures-Sur-Yvette: Group pour l’Ḗtude de la Civilisation du Moyen-Orient (Res Orientales XXVII). ed. by R. Gyselen. Pp. 91-115.
Weber, D., )2020(. “Pahlavi Legal Documents from Tabarestān: The Documents Tab. 11, 28 and 27: A Philological Approach.” In: Persia (552 BCE-758 CE): Primary Sources, Old and New. édité par R. Gyselen. Bures-sur-Yvette. Group pour l’Étude de la civilization du Moyen-Orient (Res Orientales XXVIII). Pp. 171-188.
Weber, D., (2022). “Pahlavi Legal Documents from Tabarestān: The Documents Tab. 16, 19, 20, 22bis and 25: A Philological Approach.” In: Sometimes Sasanian Always ĒR. édité par R. Gyselen. Bures-sur-Yvette. Group pour l’Étude de la civilization du Moyen-Orient (Res Orientales XXIX). Pp. 105-129.